This past summer, I took a trip down to Pittsburgh to visit the Andy Warhol Museum. This art museum, dedicated to the infamous artist known for being a tour de force in the pop art scene, had been on my bucket list of Pittsburgh museums to visit, and it did not disappoint.
While traversing the seven floors of Warhol’s artistic life, certain pieces really popped (pun intended) out to me, especially after recently completing a survey course in my art history class that included a few prominent Warhol pieces.

What I didn’t expect to find amidst all of the 1960’s-80’s art included a Warhol original remix edition of Botticelli’s renaissance classic painting, Birth of Venus. Gone was her golden hair, the idyllic coastline, or the mythological figures floating around Venus that I critiqued in many art history essays; instead, Warhol focused just on her face, transformed her gilded hair into a new kind of a colorful masterpiece, and then repeated this print over. And over. And over again.

The question that I had, and that I’m sure you’re all having, is why? Why did Warhol, and many other artists, deliberately chose to incorporate paintings or prints from the past (or their present) and re-purpose them for their own artistic uses?
Simply put, these artists, especially Warhol, picked infamous images and collected them together to make sense of the world around them. By going back to classical antiquity with Venus, or by infusing culturally-known products, such as Campbell’s Soup, into his works, Warhol essentially was making a commentary about the society he knew in the one way he know how–through his art.
Altogether, the art world, to a certain extent, is known for drawing inspiration from others–and this is something that is celebrated! Learning about the connections certain artists had to one another, and seeing those features in the other’s artwork, adds another layer of depth and appreciation to the piece as a whole–something that, when done right, can make art even more beautiful and important to society.

